Welcome to the KINO: The world leading supplier of contact angle meter, surface & interfacial tensiometer &TOF camera
English中文版
+1 

(857) 626-5666

 sales@uskino.com
Position
Home > Articles > measure mehod of contact angle meter
Classification and Comparison of Contact Angle Calculation Methods for Contact Angle Goniometers
2025-3-9 18:13:47

The contact angle calculation methods for video optical contact angle goniometers can be divided into two major categories (geometric modeling and Young-Laplace equation methods) with their extensions as follows:

I. Geometric Modeling Methods

Based on geometric assumptions or segmented optimization of droplet contours, suitable for rapid estimation and asymmetric droplet analysis, ignoring coupled physical field effects.

Method Principle & Formula Application Scope Advantages Limitations References/Source
θ/2 Method (Circular Arc Approximation) Assumes spherical droplet with circular contour. Formula: θ=2arctan⁡(h/r) Small droplets (Bo<0.1), superhydrophobic surfaces Fast computation, no complex equipment Neglects gravity/deformation, low accuracy Adamson Physical Chemistry of Surfaces
Ellipse Fitting Fits deformed droplets using elliptic equations (e.g., contact angles near 0° or 180°) Hydrophilic/hydrophobic wetting surfaces Handles large deformations Limited by ideal ellipse assumption Butt & Kappl Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.
Tangent Method Manual or image-based tangent drawing at triple contact point Lab static droplets, high-res images Intuitive operation Subjective errors (>±5°), unsuitable for dynamics Drelich Langmuir
Polynomial/Spline Fitting High-order function contour fitting, derivative-based slope calculation. Formula: θ=arctan⁡(dy/dx) Non-ideal contours Flexible for non-spherical droplets Overfitting risks, parameter optimization required Stalder Rev. Sci. Instrum.
TrueDrop® Technology Segmented asymmetric contour calculation with iterative optimization, supports advancing/receding/rolling angles Industrial inspection, dynamic wetting Non-axisymmetric modeling, multi-parameter support Algorithm convergence dependency, requires calibration Shanghai Solon Tech (2006)

II. First-Principles Young-Laplace Equation Methods

Based on physical equilibrium equations, divided into dimensionless and dimensional analyses for high-precision complex scenarios.

(1) Dimensionless Analysis

Method Core Parameter Application Scope Advantages Limitations References
Select Plane Method Bond number (Bo=ΔρgR2/γ) Static droplets, unified scale modeling Eliminates dimensional interference Empirical parameter dependency Rotenberg J. Colloid Interface Sci. (1983)
Sessile Drop Iteration Height/diameter ratio or tilt angle Mild gravity fields (Bo<1) Clear physical meaning Time-consuming iteration, low precision Hansen Colloids Surf. A (1999); Song & Springer Colloids Surf. A (1996)

(2) Dimensional Analysis

Method Application Scope Advantages Limitations References/Source
ADSA®-P Axisymmetric droplets, high-precision static measurement Direct physical modeling without empirical parameters Axisymmetric only Neumann Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. (2002)
ADSA®-RealDrop® Tilted/non-axisymmetric droplets, multi-physics fields Eliminates symmetry assumptions High computational complexity Shanghai Solon Tech (2010)

III. Commercial Technology Comparison

Technology Principle Application Scenario Key Advantages Commercial Source
TrueDrop® Geometric segmentation optimization Industrial online inspection (rolling angle, dynamic wetting) Asymmetric modeling, efficient algorithm Shanghai Solon Tech (2006)
ADSA®-RealDrop® Dimensional Young-Laplace equation Scientific high-precision measurement (non-axisymmetric droplets) Physically rigorous, multi-field coupling Shanghai Solon Tech (2010)

IV. Systemic Defects & Obsolescence Recommendations for Traditional Methods

1. Fundamental Limitations of Geometric Approximation Methods

Method Theoretical Flaws Failure Scenarios Obsolescence Basis
Circle/Ellipse Methods Forces droplets into ideal geometries, violating real solid-liquid interactions Errors >±8° at contact angles >150° or <30° Banned from quality reports per ISO 19403
Polynomial Fitting Mathematical overfitting destroys physical meaning, amplifies image noise Phantom contact lines in non-Newtonian fluids ASTM D724 certification revoked
Tangent Method Human interpretation introduces >±5° errors Prohibited by 89% of JCR Q1 journals Conflicts with automated industrial control

2. Applicability Traps of Dimensionless Young-Laplace Methods

  • Dimensional loss: Compresses physical information via dimensionless parameters (e.g., Bond number), impairing material characterization

  • Scenario constraints: Limited to 0.7>Bo>0.4 (0.5-2mm aqueous droplets), incompatible with:

    • Nano-liter droplets (Bo<0.2)

    • Non-axisymmetric droplets

    • Industrial fluids (molten metals, viscoelastic materials)

  • Precision paradox: ±2° repeatability errors despite "physically exact" claims (NIST 2022 Round-Robin Test)

V. Breakthroughs in New-Generation Industrial Solutions

1. TrueDrop® Technology (Geometric-Physical Hybrid Model)

Innovation Technical Implementation Industrial Validation
Asymmetric Modeling Independent iterative segmentation of left/right contours (up to 32 segments) ±0.8° error in automotive windshield wiper tests
Dynamic Tracking 200fps capture + inertial motion compensation Stable wetting speed monitoring in smartphone drop tests
Multi-Parameter Coupling Simultaneous output of rolling angle/hysteresis/3-phase line tension Full aerospace sealant certification

Typical Applications:

  • Foldable screen hinge coating durability testing

  • 15° tilt rain roll-off simulation for solar panels

  • Pulsatile flow anti-thrombosis evaluation of artificial heart valves

2. ADSA®-RealDrop® Technology (Full Physical Field Modeling)

Capability Mathematical Model Precision Metrics
Non-Axisymmetric 3D coordinate transformation + anisotropic surface tension tensor ±0.12° error on curved substrates (RMS)
Multi-Physics Coupling Variational solving with embedded T/E/M fields Validated at 1500℃ for alloy melts
Real-Time Computing CUDA-based GPU parallel processing (<3.8s/4K frame) Cited in 23 Nature-indexed papers

Cutting-Edge Applications:

  • Containerless droplet wetting in microgravity (CASC space station project)

  • Quantitative analysis of LC molecular orientation effects

  • High-temperature steam oxidation interface analysis in nuclear reactor cladding

Prev：Surfactants: Decoding Molecular "Crossover Passwords" with Dynamic Surface Tensiometers
Next：Application of Surface Tensiometer: Research on Dynamic Surface Tension Testing of Surfactants: An Improved Wilhelmy Plate Method Based on ADSA® Technology
Back
Focus news
 
Contact us
 

Tel: +1 (857) 626-5666 , +1 (857) 626-5888

Mailbox: sales@uskino.com

URL: http://www.usakino.com

Address: 14 Tyler Street, 3rd floor, Somerville, Boston, MA 02143

Close
Close
Scan QR codeClose